Evidence gaps
Support links can be missing, stale, or hard to trace to reported values.
Your inventory may be complete. That doesn’t mean it is ready for assurance.
Emivra independently reviews GHG inventories from spreadsheets and carbon platforms to surface the issues that deserve attention before assurance.
- Vendor-neutral review
- Cross-platform inputs
- Independent review layer
- Exception-focused review
- Explainable findings
- Evidence-aware checks
Calculated is not assurance-ready.
Emivra surfaces meaningful exceptions earlier so skilled reviewers can focus on professional judgment, not first-pass checking.
-
-
Period and baseline breaks
Missing, duplicate, or misaligned periods and baselines can skew comparisons.
-
Factor and unit mismatches
Applied factors, units, or assumptions may not match the activity context.
-
Reconciliation exceptions
Unexplained differences and unusual shifts are flagged early for focused reviewer attention.
Where Emivra fits in the review flow
Between inventory calculation and assurance readiness, Emivra is a vendor-neutral GHG QA/QC and assurance-preflight layer.
Workflow sequence
Inventory prepared in spreadsheets and carbon-accounting systems
Emivra independent QA/QC preflight layer
Import & Check
For exported inventories.
Enter & Check
For lighter direct entry.
External assurance and independent verifier review
Emivra surfaces meaningful exceptions before assurance and does not replace assurance providers.
What Emivra is
- Vendor-neutral GHG inventory QA/QC and assurance-preflight software.
- Checks completeness, consistency, factors, and evidence traceability.
- Built to surface meaningful exceptions for skilled reviewer judgment.
How inventories enter review
- Import & Check for exports from existing systems.
- Enter & Check for lighter direct entry workflows.
- Both paths run the same QA/QC and pre-assurance logic.
What stays with people
- Systems of record remain the source of inventory calculation.
- Assurance procedures and verifier responsibilities stay independent.
- Findings inform professional judgment; they are not assurance opinions.
Representative issue examples
Issues Emivra can surface before assurance
Representative examples only—not an exhaustive checklist. Emivra flags conditions for reviewer follow-up.
Missing evidence
Entries missing source files, links, or supporting documentation.
Period gaps or duplicates
Missing periods or overlapping entries across entities or cycles.
Factor mismatches
Factor year, geography, or source misaligned with activity data.
Reconciliation differences
Totals differ across ledgers, submissions, and inventory roll-ups.
Unusual changes
Period-to-period shifts that need explanation before external review.
FAQ
Quick fit, clarified.
Short answers for teams checking fit before requesting a demo.
-
What does Emivra do?
Emivra is a vendor-neutral QA/QC and assurance-preflight layer that flags review issues before formal assurance. -
Where does Emivra fit between inventory preparation and assurance?
It fits between completed inventory preparation and external assurance as a focused pre-assurance QA/QC step. -
Does Emivra replace assurance providers or professional judgment?
Emivra supports QA/QC and assurance-preflight only. It does not provide assurance, verification, or certification, and does not replace professional judgment.
Check workflow fit with Emivra
See where Emivra fits your review workflow and helps surface meaningful exceptions earlier.